Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Limbaugh letters

Friday, August 15th, 2008

I got more email in response to my column about Rush Limbaugh’s commentary during KOA radio’s morning newscast than any other column I’ve written for the Rocky.

Weirdly, most letter writers thought I was arguing that KOA should hire a talk show host to balance Rush’s three hours on KOA. Actually, I was merely suggesting that KOA find a left-leaning pundit to deliver a one-minute commentary during the newcast, to uphold the basic journalistic value of fairness that KOA claims to strive for on its morning newscast.

I thought it was interesting the Clear Channel executive Kris Olinger said that Rush Limbaugh’s contract with KOA requires KOA to air a one-minute commentary by Rush during drive time, when most people (whether Rush fans or not) are tuned in.

Here’s a few of the letters I got.

From Laura
I agree with Sean Rima, you are a whiny little girl.  I listen to KOA religiously.  The only time we ever turn it over to progressive radio is when the Rockies are playing and KOA isn’t broadcasting over the internet.  After all, it’s good to know what the enemy is up to.  Also, trying to tell Mike Rosen how to conduct an interview is like trying to tell the Pope how to celebrate the Mass, or trying to give tech support to Bill Gates.  Get a life.

 
From Ron Vander Kooi, Ph.D.
I can only agree with you that KOA is way overdue to provide a minimal amount of balance to its talk shows and commentary!
When I was a boy, and as a young adult, visiting relatives in Denver with my parents, I thought of KOA as a high quality station, “the Voice of the West.”
Now at 70 and after 14 years living here, I can barely manage to listen to limited news on that station. 
And Limbaugh is the leading disgrace on that station (competing with others whose bias and lying approach is equally distorted if not outright lying).  His arrogance is so flagrant that I wonder at anyone who thinks of him positively, even as an entertainer.
But he has done so much damage at a time when many citizens would seem to prefer distortions in order to protect their own status.
 He has misled so many people that his behavior can only be regarded as secondary to war crimes, and he will, I believe, be called to accounting in his lifetime…or beyond.  I’ve tried to address him asking, “Have you no shame?” 
Certainly Hiightower, with his own biases, could not begin to approach Rush’s blowhard approach, even with spot promotions that lasted a half hour.
KOA uses airwaves that allegedly belong to you, me and the citizenry.  It disregards its responsibility to be fair in its broadcasting, and I must believe that there will come a time of reckoning -if it does not begin at once to provide an increasing amount of balance.  Or is it only money that controls this democracy?

 
From Genie Blume
I like Hightower but don’t agree he’s the one.  Ed Schultz could do the job.
Wouldn’t it be fun to pit Randi Rhodes vs. Rush considering his obvious lack of success with the ladies. Even without the famous arm tied behind his brain.
What would be even more satisfying is a real debate between Rush or Hannity and Rhodes or Schultz.  No notes, no screeners or producers feeding data to the contestants.
We need to put Rush and company on display.  Perhaps include a new “Rush Room” at one of Jesse Morreale’s events at Mescal during the convention where Rush could consort with members of the Creative Coalition. He’s such a name dropper.
Yes, Denver could be the birthplace of fairness in broadcasting leading to real discourse.
We have more like the “arrogant self delusional” in our midst in the form of Rosen, Caldera, Gunnie Bob and, oh yes, sweet Dan (what ever happened to the righteous protector of human rights and law after O.J.?
I say to you Jason Salzman, you have a lot of work to do.  We’re watching.

Free Ride

Monday, May 19th, 2008

Here’s my review of Free Ride: John McCain and the Media, by David Brock and Paul Waldman.

Overall, the book provides a great framework to understand McCain, even if there’s not a lot of new material. I thought the section on McCain’s testy relationship with the Arizona news media was particularly interesting.

The book should have had an index, to help researchers.

This version of my review is available for full use by anyone.

 

More on C-Span’s rightward tilt

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

In 2004, I studied C-Span’s “Washington Journal” and showed that it favored right-wing guests over progressive ones.

Now the Center for Economic and Policy Research has studied C-Span more broadly and showed that C-Span overwhelmingly favored conservative think tanks in its coverage last year.

C-Span shouldn’t be written off as a meaningless space holder on cable. It’s an important conduit of serious information. It shouldn’t favor right-wing ideas.

Post made right call on photo

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007

I’m sympathetic to the folks who think the photos of killers like Matthew Murray, who gunned down Colorado church goers Sunday, should not appear in the news.

But if you follow this logic, you could argue against showing the images of all kinds of criminals, for fear that making them celebrities will encourage copy cat crimes.

Not only would this not be in the public interest, because the people want to see these images and it’s important for the public to see them, but it wouldn’t be effective.

Photos and information about mass murderers will leak out anyway. In fact, you could argue that trying to hide information and imagery about a killer may encourage copy cat murders as much or more as highlighting the information would.

I’m not saying journalists should throw every photo of a typical gang member on the front page, but a photo of a mass murderer like Matthew Murray should go on the front page, absolutely.

So, the Denver Post made the right call today in running Murray’s photo on page 1. The Post Managing Editor Gary Clark emailed me the following in response to my question about The Post’s decision:

We ran Mathew Murray’s photo because, generally, readers are interested in seeing a photo of a person who is the center of a major story. It’s news. And this was not a Seung-Hui Cho-style, gun-brandishing self-portrait. It was a five-year-old photo provided by an acquaintance. In addition, the photo complimented the quotation on page one attributed to Murray.”

The Post made the right call. The Rocky, which ran Murray’s photo in the interior of the newspaper, made the wrong decision.

 

PR conference for progressives

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007

Here’s info about a conference I’m organizing Jan 31 – Feb. 1, 2008:

A National Conference on Media Relations for Progressives

True Spin Conference, Jan. 31 …• Feb. 1, 2008, Denver, CO

Join some of America’s best progressive PR practitioners for two days of panels, workshops, networking, and fun.

This conference brings together flacks from progressive advocacy groups around the country to exchange ideas and learn new and creative PR tactics.
Officials from giant corporations meet all the time to share their latest and greatest media relations strategies. This is our turn. It’s the only national conference of its kind.

Keynote Speakers:

Lori Dorfman, Berkeley Media Studies Group;
Alan Jenkins, The Opportunity Agenda;
David Sirota, Author, Hostile Takeover;

Other Faculty:

Medea Benjamin, Code Pink;
Andy Bichlbaum, Yes Men!;
Kathy Bonk and Emily Tynes, Authors, Strategic Communications for Nonprofits;
Beach Codevilla, Spitfire Strategies;
Martin Kearns, Green Media Toolshed;
Robert Perez, Fenton Communications;
Rashad Robinson, GLAAD;
Heath Wickline, SPIN Project.
 

Read more about these folks and other faculty here.

 

The last True Spin Conference was held in 2006 and sold out. We had about 200 registrants from around the country, including PR people from all types of progressive organizations. Click here to read more about the 2006 event.

To register, visit our website.

Session topics include:
 

  • How to Work with Hollywood;
  • How to Deal with EDs who Just Don’t Get it;
  • YouTube: Show and Tell;
  • Strategic Media Planning;
  • Be like GLAAD;
  • New Communications Technologies;
  • Theatrical Protest: A Case Study in Pink;
  • How to Collaborate with the Netroots and Bloggers;
  • Connecting PR to Fundraising;
  • See preliminary program here http://www.truespinconference.com/program.html

 

 

www.truespinconference.com
 

ROX vs. FOX Continued

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

Posted by Matt Poundstone 

A short side note in Jason’s last column urged people who might own Fox News hats to do like his father and take a marker to the FOX logo,  turning the …F’ to an …R’ and spelling out …Rox News’ in support of our World Series-bound Rockies.

This suggestion is sound advice for free-media loving Americans and baseball fans alike.  But it also begs the question:  Who out there would actually wear a Fox News hat?

For inquiring minds that want to know, here’s what a quick Internet search revealed.

First of all, the phrase “Fox News hat” yields few instructive results on Google.  The same thing goes for “sporting” and “wearing a/his/her Fox News hat.”  It doesn’t help a Google search when the word …hat’ appears frequently in the blogosphere vernacular.

But overall, the web reveals some limited utility in wearing a Fox hat, ranging from the provocative to the absurd.

If, for example, you are trying to annoy Hollywood anti-war activists like Sean Penn and Tim Robbins, walk up to them with a microphone and a Fox News cap and ask whether they want America to succeed in Iraq.  The hat turns out to be the cherry that gets extra press for a guerrilla interview.

If you’re an outspoken member of the alleged liberal media elite, the cap can also be hip and ironic.  At the memorial for journalist Molly Ivins, a slide show featured a photo of her in a Fox News hat.  The sight drew roaring laughter from the audience.

Finally, from the Random Celebrity Sighting files:  a man in a Fox News hat appears at a paintball adventure with none other than William “James Tiberius Kirk” Shatner.  The man in the photo is listed as Col. David Hunt, who is (you guessed it) a Fox News contributor.

So, if you’re in the mood to agitate the left or engage in simulated combat with a TV celeb, a Fox News cap might be for you.

For the rest of us, there will always be the …Rox News’ alternative…-or the often wise example of Molly Ivins to treat the whole enterprise as a joke.

Carman quits

Monday, October 8th, 2007

Denver Post columnist Diane Carman has resigned to take a job on the Presidential Climate Action Project at UC-D.

Tuesday, September 4th, 2007

In my column Saturday, I didn’t discuss the possibility that protesting could generate increased media coverage of the DNC.

Don’t count on it. If there is protesting, it will be minor. And if there are arrests, I bet the numbers will be small and the actions peaceful and therefore not attracting Seattle-WTO-like coverage.

Someone told me she thought the DNC would get more coverage because it’s in the West. Yup, she’s a Democratic political consultant, and she forgets that the real world doesn’t care about speculation that western states could decide the 2008 presidential election, at least not enough to drive ratings. So this issue, while obviously important, won’t affect media coverage of the DNC.

Here’s the full email text of retired 9News anchor Ed Sardella’s thoughts on media coverage of the Democratic National Convention.

I think the downward spiral of interest in and coverage of orchestrated, suspense-less conventions will continue on the national and local level.  Denver media may enjoy an unusual level of interest just because the Dem convention is here.

I predict there will be less coverage than 2004, and that print will rely on their outsources more than ever before. I can’t comment specifically on the number who will attend but I think it will be down significantly from 2004.

Back in the heyday of TV news with big budgets, it was worth the expense to stations on the local level to have their anchor seen live in front of the banner at the podium that said, “Democratic (or Republican) National Convention.” I had personal experience with that. At the conventions I was sent to in the 80’s, it seemed I started hearing “WRAP” in my ear as soon as I and the banner appeared on the screen together. The importance of the shot far exceeded the content of the report. Those days are gone. I sense local stations will not send people to the conventions in large numbers not only because of the financial consideration but out of conviction that few, if any, watching at home will care… banner or not.

Three other factors in the equation may be worth mentioning. First, the circus that is presidential campaigns has crossed the line into the theater of the absurd in the minds of hoards of citizens because of the early campaigning and the childish and frantic obsession on the part of the states to be first or early with their primaries. I heard reports this week that all will be decided by March, if not sooner.  That will leave months before the conventions for people to put the campaign completely out of mind.

The second factor is the location of the conventions. I have had a number of print people tell me that the attractiveness of the venue has a lot to do with the intensity of the lobbying for the assignment in their newsrooms. Perhaps that is an element of the decision making process that is underestimated. How will this year’s locations be seen by reporters who might have the option (and luxury) of going or not going?

Third, and unknown, is to what degree, if any, the candidates’ reliance on new media to attract young potential voters will succeed. I am on the pessimistic side of center.

 

 

Diana DeGette on Local Media

Monday, August 13th, 2007

Some politicians won’t ever criticize the news media. So you have to admire Rep. Diana DeGette for talking to me about the local media’s propensity to neglect her work, while falling over themselves to cover Rep. Tom Tancredo’s latest outrage.

I quoted DeGette briefly in my Saturday column.

And here are more of her thoughts from my interview with her July 24. “I am back here in Washington working hard on issues that my constituents care about. But I am not back here thinking hard about how I’m going to get the soundbite. And sometimes I feel like the local press would be much more interested if I picked a fight with somebody or said something outrageous than if I was just back here working hard every day trying to pass legislation that benefits my constituents and the American public.

I could be back here trying to come up with catchy sound bites or picking edgy issues. Some of the issues I pick are edgy issues but I make them into mainstream issues, like the stem cell issue-.But right now I’ve been pegged by the Whip as the Chief Deputy Whip in charge of shepherding the State Children’s Health insurance plan through the house. So I’m working with the leadership to make the SCHIP bill happen.

And it’s the same with the Energy Bill. As vice Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee I’m trying to work across the Caucus to shepherd that bill through the House as well.

I think my constituents know that.

The other problem that the local papers have is that both papers over the past few years have cut their Washington Bureaus, and I think it’s extremely hard for reporters at the local level to know what’s truly going on in Washington, especially when they are dealing with politicians. Politicians will all take credit for doing everything, and sometimes it’s hard for local reporters to sort out who’s really making a difference or working on an issue or who’s just taking credit. And I think that is really hard for local reporters-.

It is frustrating when you are working hard in a leadership role and accomplishing things but the local press won’t print it. They have to read the New York Times and Washington Post to see what I’m doing.”

Other mistakes in Manzanares coverage

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

In my column on Saturday, I argued that the dailies overplayed the allegation that former city attorney Larry Manzanares had porn on a stolen computer in his home.

One aburd front-page Denver Post headline read, “Indictment alleges sex videos viewed.” Big deal.

In response to criticism for hyping the porn, the dailies have said that the porn could explain Manzanares’ motive in the case. It’s true that Manzanares could have been embarrassed, even though the prosecution stated that no child porn or illegal porn has yet been identified. Maybe Manzanares took the computer to hide the porn he was viewing at work. Or to look at porn at home. Who knows? It’s all speculation, not worthy of front page headlines.

And besides, there are other possible motives: There were legal documents and jury instructions on the laptop. Maybe Manzanares, if he stole the computer, was a workaholic, not a sex addict, as the dailies speculated. Or you could speculate that he was a combination of the two. Seriously.

Or maybe he was just cheap. Just because he made a six-figure salary doesn’t mean he wouldn’t be motivated to save $300 bucks or $1,500 bucks. Lots of rich people are frugal beyond belief. Maybe he had financial pressure and struggled with a shopping addiction instead of a porn addiction.

Maybe that’s far-fetched. Maybe not. But my point is that the speculation about Manzanares’ motive rose too high on the news agenda, and if the operative motive hadn’t involved porn, you can bet it wouldn’t have been given the headlines it got.

Another mistake of journalists was failing to offer critiques of the prosecution’s tactics until after former Manzanares killed himself. You’d think that they would have done this, as they did on Sunday, just to balance out the focus on the porn. But this critical reporting came too late.

You have to respect the dailies for writing articles about the anger that’s currently directed at them for the Manzanares coverage, but you also have to wonder why they don’t cop to making any mistakes. How often does hindsight fail to illuminate mistakes? But the editors at the dailies are basically saying they were fair. Period.

I’m not blaming the media for Manzanares’ death at all. But journalists should be as honest as possible about their coverage, even if it means admitting a mistake or two.