The Denver Post may be on the verge of taking new approach to opinion blogging
It’s been bugging me that The Denver Post’s Spot blog runs The Post’s editorial opinion without any other opinions to balance things out.
What about offering a little more diversity of views on the Spot? Or, better yet, scrub the opinion from the blog.
So I sent an email to Post Editorial Page editor Curtis Hubbard:
I notice that you occasionally place Denver Post editorials on the blog. And Alicia Caldwell posts there occasionally.
I don’t think this is fair because readers of the Spot get The Post’s opinion without getting the range of opinion they find on the commentary pages. So, for example, they hear your side on the paid-sick-days initiative but not other views. (Caldwell’s pieces are usually more informational than opinion.)
Even if you argue that The Post’s in-house editorial is centrist, you’d admit that it’s consistently anti-union and, for that matter, pro gay rights.
So I think you should throw Littwin’s and Carroll’s columns onto the blog, if you’re going to offer opinions there, so readers get a range of views.
Hubbard’s response makes you think we may be seeing a new opinion blog emanating from The Post soon:
We originally envisioned that The Spot would need both opinion and news content in order to thrive. Turns out, the politics team is more than capable of producing a popular blog with little help from the opinion side of the building.
Several of the posts you point out were done as part “beta testing” for opinion blogging, which I hope to have more to say on soon.
I’d love to see The Post take a serious shot at opinion blogging. It’s track record (Gang of Four, Spot misfires) isn’t good, but it appeared that those past efforts were never loved and cared for.
I’m looking forward to seeing what’s coming, if anything.