U.S. Senate Majority Leader McConnell says Glenn’s acceptance of a conservative endorsement is like having a “ticket on the Titanic”
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell waded into Colorado politics Saturday, telling KNUS 710’s Craig Silverman that to accept the endorsement of the Senate Conservative Fund (SCF) is like having a “ticket on the Titanic”
So, since Republican U.S. Senate candidate Darryl Glenn has accepted the SCF endorsement, McConnell would preumably say Glenn’s boat is headed toward an iceberg–though McConnell told Silverman he doesn’t know anythig about Glenn.
SILVERMAN: Who is behind the Senate Conservative Fund? You know, they were just in the news in Colorado because they have committed to a candidate: Darryl Glenn, El Paso County Commissioner. And he is their selection. Do you know anything about Darryl Glenn? Or, do you just –.
McCONNELL: I don’t. I don’t. But I can tell you, in Indiana there was a primary the doctor told her that the federal government ever primary between a Senate Conservatives Fund nominee and Congressman Todd Young, the other candidate. And the candidate of the Senate Conservatives Fund tried to make me an issue in the Indiana Senate primary. He lost by 34 points. So, you know, I think any candidate who signs up with the Senate Conservatives Fund has to wonder whether that’s a smart strategy.
SILVERMAN: Well, who is behind the SCF? It used to be Jim DeMint. Is he still the guy there?
McCONNELL: It was Senator DeMint originally. But it continues. I’m not sure who’s running it now. But they have an outstanding record of defeat, and you’ve got to wonder whether any candidate who is running a smart campaign would want to sign up with those guys. It’s sort of like a ticket on the Titanic.
Asked for a response to McConnell’s attack, Glenn told me:
Glenn: “I understand he feels that way, and I look forward to seeing him at my swearing in. We will prove him wrong.”
When he was endorsed by the SCF last month, Glenn told The Denver Post that he was “very humbled” to receive the endorsement.
Ken Cuccinelli, president of the SCF said of Glenn in a statement, as reported by The Post: “He’s an inspiring leader who will defend the Constitution and stand up to the liberals in both parties.” “We are excited about his candidacy and will do everything we can to help him with this important race,” he added.
Silverman pointed out that McConnell, who’s said that talk radio misleads conservatives and may have contributed to the rise of Trump, cites Colorado’s 2010 Senate race, lost by Ken Buck, in McConnell’s recent book, The Long Game, as an example of what Republicans should not do.
Here’s a partial transcript of McConnell’s June 4 conversation with Silverman.
SILVERMAN: In your book you write about how Colorado blew it in 2010, with the help of the Senate Conservative Fund. What were you talking about there, in 2010, and why do you have such animus for the SCF—the Senate Conservative Fund?
McCONNELL: Well, the Senate Conservatives Fund has been endorsing people who, if they win the primary, can’t win in the general. We lost three seats in 2010, one there in Denver, with candidates who were unable to appeal to a broader audience in November.
SILVERMAN: Ken Buck.
HOST CRAIG SILVERMAN: Boy, I liked when you said that. And you said you were “perplexed” by Michael Bennet’s vote. We would use a different ‘P’ word, and that would be “pissed” at Michael Bennet because he undercut a lot of Colorado supporters — people who thought that he was on the side of Israel, but [it] turned out he was on Team Obama. And I’ll tell you, it was very disappointing. And that’s why a lot of us feel he needs to be replaced as the United States Senator. Have you been following this campaign out in Colorado?
U.S. SENATE MAJORITY LEADER, MITCH McCONNELL: Yeah, I know you don’t have a nominee yet, but I’ve certainly been following the competition. We hope to be able to compete in Colorado. Obviously, that will depend on getting a candidate who has a shot at winning.
SILVERMAN: In your book you write about how Colorado blew it in 2010, with the help of the Senate Conservative Fund. What were you talking about there, in 2010, and why do you have such animus for the SCF—the Senate Conservative Fund?
McCONNELL: Well, the Senate Conservatives Fund has been endorsing people who, if they win the primary, can’t win in the general. We lost three seats in 2010, one there in Denver, with candidates who were unable to appeal to a broader audience in November.
SILVERMAN: Ken Buck
McCONNELL: We lost two in 2012 in Indiana and Missouri, with candidate who were unable to appeal to the larger audience. And so in 2014 we took a different strategy and competed with the Senate Conservatives Fund everywhere they backed a candidate, and defeated them in every primary in 2014. And that’s why we have a new majority. And of course, your outstanding Senator, Cory Gardner, was a part of all that. And it reminds everybody that the only way you can make policy is to actually win the election. So, the nominating process, in order to work for us, needs to produce nominees who can actually win in November. Otherwise, you’ve wasted your time.
SILVERMAN: Who is behind the Senate Conservative Fund? You know, they were just in the news in Colorado because they have committed to a candidate: Darryl Glenn, El Paso County Commissioner. And he is their selection. Do you know anything about Darryl Glenn? Or, do you just –.
McCONNELL: I don’t. I don’t. But I can tell you, in Indiana there was a primary the doctor told her that the federal government ever primary between a Senate Conservatives Fund nominee and Congressman Todd Young, the other candidate. And the candidate of the Senate Conservatives Fund tried to make me an issue in the Indiana Senate primary. He lost by 34 points. So, you know, I think any candidate who signs up with the Senate Conservatives Fund has to wonder whether that’s a smart strategy.
SILVERMAN: Well, who is behind the SCF? It used to be Jim DeMint. Is he still the guy there?
McCONNELL: It was Senator DeMint originally. But it continues. I’m not sure who’s running it now. But they have an outstanding record of defeat, and you’ve got to wonder whether any candidate who is running a smart campaign would want to sign up with those guys. It’s sort of like a ticket on the Titanic.