Amendment 41 Dream Team?

Dream Team? Rocky columnist Mike Littwin wrote Feb. 6 that wealthy entrepreneur Jared Polis hired a “dream team” of “high-paid lawyers and lobbyists” to defend Amendment 41.  

I don’t know why Polis’ team is any more dreamy than the hired guns attacking Amendment 41. In fact, the Rocky reported Jan. 24 that both sides hired “big guns” to represent them.  

In any case, the phrase “dream team” is laden with opinion, so it’s appropriate for Littwin’s column, but it’s not right for a news story, unless it’s attributed to someone.  

Yet, the day after “dream team” appeared in Littwin’s column, the phrase popped up twice in a Rocky interview with Jared Polis.  

The Rocky told Polis that “very few people can hire the dream team that you’ve hired,” and in another question asked how much he was paying for the “dream team.”  

The Polis interview was tough and interesting. And I wish more Rocky interviews were as aggressive as this one was.  

But the use of “dream team” introduced bias, particularly since it appeared in Littwin’s column the day before.  

I was left thinking that the reporter was trying to suggest that Polis’ wealth is giving him an advantage in the legislative fight, allowing him to hire the best consultants money can buy, while Amendment 41’s opponents can’t do this.  

Maybe this is true, but I doubt it, and it certainly hasn’t been proven.  

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.