Would Gessler tell Vincent Carroll whether he thinks there’s election fraud in Denver?
Part of the reason Denver Post columnist Vincent Carroll is effective at getting under the skin of liberals is that he’s so good at mixing his opinion with interviews and other types of original reporting.
In my lowly way as a progressive blogger, I try to write like Carroll, with his edge and clear reporting, though he’s better at it (though his opinion is usually wrong, even if his facts are right).
So I read his column.
On Saturday morning, Carroll is very effectively ripping apart the county clerks, and at the end, he’s quoting from his personal interview with Secretary of State Scott Gessler.
For weeks, I’d been trying to ask Gessler–or anyone in his press office–a simple question about whether he thinks there’s fraud in Denver elections, and his office will not comment.
But he’s yapping it up with Carroll.
So I emailed Carroll:
I’m wondering, do you think Gessler or his media people should talk to me, even if I’m progressive, as they do you.
…what seems to bother Gessler’s spokesman the most about me is the fact that I crosspost on ColoradoPols, obviously a left-leaning blog.
I mean, it would be one thing if I were a progressive hatchet man, but I really don’t think I’m harder on the conservatives I interview than you are on the liberals who talk to you.
Carroll replied:
You are right that you are not a left-leaning hatchet man, but that doesn’t mean Gessler is under any obligation to talk to you. Some people won’t take my calls, too. Such is life in journalism.
Right.
But you’d think a public official would at least listen to the question, and if it’s a basic one, like whether there’s election fraud in Denver, and if the answer would serve the public interest, he’d respond, whether the questioner were progressive or conservative.