Tough follow-up questioning is so much more fun to watch than the wimpy kind…-and it makes for better informed voters besides.
Case in point: CBS4′s Gloria Neal’s exchange Saturday night with Ken Buck over the question, “Will you really make a raped woman carry a child to full term?”
Fair question, but Buck didn’t answer it, prompting Neal to ask it again.
Buck responded by arguing that “we need to stay focused on the issues that voters in this state care about, and those are spending and jobs.”
“Social issues are important to the voters in this state. I am one of them. So I need you to answer that question, because in addition to votes and jobs and all of that abortion is very important, and when you start talking about rape and incest, that is important to the voters. So, please, answer that question.”
Buck then said:
“I am pro-life, and I don’t believe in the exceptions of rape and incest.”
As a debate moderator, Neal gets credit for noticing that Buck said voters don’t care about social issues. It’s a lot harder than it looks to realize that, yes, Buck had just said voters don’t care about social issues, like choice.
Was Neal right to tell Buck that voters do care about social issues? Absolutely. Plenty of polls show that voters, especially women, care about these issues. Otherwise, you can bet Bennet wouldn’t keep harping on them.
Was she right to say that she is one of those voters who cares about social issues? Yes, she’s entitle to say this, as a journalist representing the public.
Neal just needs to be fair to both candidates, which she was.