Crummy to partly crummy

November 26th, 2008

I’m waiting for the day that a local TV station leads its late-night “newscast” with the weather segment. Yes, I know, this already happens whenever a small storm can possibly be hyped into a big-sounding one. But I think someday we’ll see the weather segment appear first on a regular basis. Think of the marketing: Weather Comes before News on Channel 20!

For those of you who like to know about the weather, but wish it were reduced to a 12-second summary on the local newscasts, you can get weather information all over the web, of course.

But there’s a local guy, who goes by “Weatherby,” who sends almost-daily emails about the upcoming weather. He lets his right-leaning politics slip out in his emails, he likes to dig at the local weather anchors, and his weather writing is blunt and fun.

I’ve been getting his emails for about a year. You also might like them.

His email earlier this week, with the subject line “yuck is on the way,” read:

Looks like there’s a decent chance for a crummy to partly crummy Thanksgiving weekend on the way with the yuk arriving about the same time the bird is done…..

To try him out, email him at SKGC77@aol.com and ask to be added to his weather list.  

Westword’s uber blogging media critic

November 24th, 2008

In my Rocky column Saturday, I discussed recent changes at Westword, Denver’s alternative weekly owned by Village Voice Media. Staff writer Mike Roberts is now the lead blogger for Westword’s news blog, The Latest Word. For nine years, he’d been writing, among other things, a weekly media column called “The Message.” He’s now writing the print column about once a month, and posting lots of short media items on the blog–as well as items about lots of other topics. (The media posts are archived on the blog in the “More Messages” category on the right side of The Latest Word home page.) Here are excerpts from my discussion with Roberts on Tuesday, Nov. 18.

 

Jason: Was the change printed in the paper?

 

Roberts: No, there hasn’t been a change announced because, as I mentioned to you in my note yesterday, the column continues to exist. It’s just that it will be appearing less frequently as a result me overseeing our online news blog, The Latest Word-.

 

The model for this is one of the papers in our Village-Voice chain, the Dallas Observer. They have a blog called Unfair Park. It’s been really successful. And the powers-that-be here have been trying to figure out why it’s been successful, with an interest towards replicating it at the other Village Voice Media papers.

 

Jason: Successful by what measure?

 

Roberts: By simply the measure of page views and unique visits.

 

Jason: Is it profitable?

 

Roberts: When you talk about online and profit, you have to use air quotes. Someday it might be profitable. Fortunately all that dollars and cents stuff is way above my pay grade. The idea is to increase the number of folks visiting our website and other Village Voice Media websites. And they’ve done really well. And one of the theories about why is that they have assigned someone to oversee that blog. His name is Robert Wilonsky-. He is overseeing that on a daily basis, and he is making sure there is a lot of content on that site, over at least 10 items every day.

 

And the idea is simply by creating content they will come, to use a Field of Dreams paraphrase. The more content you put up there, the more people seem to be coming to the site.

 

So the idea was, and we were the first paper to try to replicate the success that the Observer has had, let’s assign somebody on very close to a full-time basis and make sure we have 10 posts a day on our news blog, and I was chosen for this mission.

 

So since we started it [June 23] every day that I have been here, we have had a minimum of 10 blogs, and our numbers are indeed way up.

 

So it seems like the theory has at least some credence to it…-that the more content we put out there, the more blogs, the more items, the more people are finding them and coming to our site. So that’s the idea-.

 

The corporate folks have been very happy with the numbers [at Westword]. I don’t know if this is a formal term used corporately or just a term we use jokingly around here, but the term we’ve been using is uber blogger. I’m the uber blogger. They have uber bloggers now assigned at other Village Voice Media papers-. I think the idea is that all the Village Voice papers will end up with someone in a role like mine-.

 

My column is about media, and I have a big interest in media and so a lot of the items I write are media-related.

 

Seven or eight years ago, my column was much longer in print than it became after the downturn started. I was getting 2,500 words per column, which is unbelievable. And because I has do much space I was able to write a really big hefty main item, and then I was able to write often three of four smaller items after that. As the page-count began to shrink, those other items often went away-.It went down to 1400 words, still very generous-.

 

Now online I essentially get to write those smaller items that I had to forgo a number of years ago. That’s one of the nice things, and I get to write a whole variety of different things, not only for the news blogs. I also used to be the music editor here and I continue to write a lot about music-.

 

The music stuff is probably easier to fit into my schedule than the full media column.

 

The way I did the media column it was very very time intensive with lots of interviews and lots of research. The music stuff is usually one interview or a review where I can write my opinion. That just fits in easier now-.

 

We also have a food blog called “Café Society.” One of my sad obsessions is cold cereal. I’m allergic to eggs, and as a result I grew up fetishizing Quisp and Quake and Count Chocula. I am getting to write a weekly cold cereal review…-a beautiful thing….

 

On The Latest Word blog, I have an interest in film as well. I actually have a Master’s Degree in screen writing from UCLA and love movies…-and this week being film festival week I’ve gotten to write film reviews and you-were-there kinds of things. I write about a wide variety of news beyond media, the stuff that’s in the headlines. So that’s the good stuff-.
 

There are cons as well as pros.  And one of the cons for me was I loved writing my column, and I loved doing long-form media writing.

 

I’ve gotten a chance to do several columns over the last few months. Certainly not every week. And I never missed a week unless I was on vacation, generally.

 

I do miss that weekly opportunity to flex my muscles in a long-form kind of way. There is the possibility that as this evolves that I will be able to get back to that.

 

Jason: When you say it’s not gone, what does that mean for now?

 

Roberts: If I have a story that comes up that I want to be able to do in a column form, I have been assured and it has been proven to be the case quite a few times that they will find space for me. That has been shown to be the case.

 

The problem is squeezing it all in.

 

I am supposed to do no more than six blogs a day, with the other four blogs being contributed by staff writers and editors, as well as the occasional freelancers. Sometimes those other four blogs have been easier to come by than others. Last week, for example, there were two days when I wrote 10 blogs and one day when I wrote nine.

 

And so, as a result of that output, there just aren’t enough hours in the day to do the column the way I would like to. If we end up having more contributions from other staff writers, and I’m able to cut back on the sheer number of the ones I’m writing myself and I’m more in the mode of processing other people’s…-I read over, post the art, edit, embed videos, all of that stuff, for everybody else’s blog. I’m sort of the producer of it, in a sense. I hope to be able to get the column into the paper more often than I have in recent months. With luck this is a transitional stage and I will be able get back to that kind of long-form writing in addition to the shorter-form blog writing-.

 

There could be some story that comes up, that’s so good that we can make arrangements to shift my workload long enough for me to be able to write the column. That option is always there.

 

At this point, I’m literally writing on average 2,000 words per day and 10,000 per week. So it’s a lot to squeeze in more.

 

Jason: That’s amazing. It really is-.

 

Roberts: What I was lucky enough to do on a weekly basis for nine years was valuable, and I hope to get back to it.

 

In the meantime, I’m able to write about media matters in shorter form and in a more timely way. And that’s one thing that we, throughout our history at Westword, always sort of rued, was that we got only one time a week to get our point of view out there, essentially one bullet in the chamber, whereas the dailies had one every day. Now we have as many as we want ever day. We can be as timely and beat them on stories-.

 

Everything is so fluid right now. Not just for this concept but for the industry in general. Every day, I walk into the office, and I’m happy when the lights got on-.

 

I have complete freedom on what I’m writing for The Latest Word, so if there is a day where there are 10 media items that I want to write, and it gets us to ten, great. So I will continue to be writing about it just as much as I can.

 

Frankly, when this first started, I had unrealistic ideas about how much I could do on a daily basis. It became clear after a while that if I were to try to write as many blogs per day as I need to and write the column that my head would look like David Cronenberg scanners. It would explode.

 

 

BigMedia.org and Face the State

November 11th, 2008

Last week, I called Brad Jones, the Editor of the online news site FaceTheState.org, to discuss the impact on the election of stories published on blogs and online news sites, like his publication.

Face the State broke some interesting stories this election cycle, like this one. But the biggest election story from an online publication was Colorado Independent’s report that Republican Scott McInnis believes he could have beaten Democrat Mark Udall for Colorado’s U.S. Senate seat. I discussed this in my column Saturday,

While I had Jones on the phone, I asked him why the url ColoradoIndependent.org leads to the landing page of FaceTheState.com. How did that happen?

Jones: They forgot to register all their domains. (laughter)

Jason: And so, are planning on keeping it forever? (laughter)

Jones: Oh, it is what it is. (laughter)

Jason: I mean, have they asked you for it?

Jones: No, you know, everything has a price. We are an independent Colorado news organization.

Jason: Do you think in the spirit of, what’s the word, you know, encouraging online journalism, that you would…-and a sense of professionalism…-be inclined to give it back to them?

Jones: Give it back to them? Look, if Cara or Wendy want to give me a call about the domain name, they can give me a call. I’m not a hard person to reach.

Jason: How’d you happen to notice that? Was it you?

Jones: Yes. You know, I own all the variants on mine. It’s basic brand protection.

In a column last year, I looked the 10 most recent news stories in the Colorado Independent and Face the State to see which online publication more often engaged in perhaps the most basic of professional journalistic practices: seeking a response from the person criticized or scrutinized in an article.

I found the Colorado Independent was much more likely to include opposing views in its articles.

Jones says that since I did my analysis, Face the State has “changed and grown and evolved,” and the Independent has also “reinvented itself” and its “staff has grown.”

“If you revisit that issue of how often we contact both parties of the story, as compared to what they do, I think hands down we are much more aggressive in our efforts to bring in opposing view points. We’re not always perfect, and I disagree with your initial analysis on that too, but, I mean, more of what we do is journalism. A lot of what they are doing now is blogging with quotes sprinkled in.”

I told Jones that I’d like to do the analysis again, and I asked him if he would join me in evaluating the stories over a given time period. Jones said, “Sure.”

I had hoped to hear back from Colorado Independent Editor Cara DeGette about whether she’d be willing to participate in a similar review of her stories. But, unfortunately, as I was completing this blog post, Westword confirmed that the Independent had laid off six employees on Monday.

So I’ll have to report on DeGette’s answer another time. But I’ll let you know, maybe in a few months, how my joint undertaking with Jones goes.

 

Schaffer’s Iraq deals given shallow treatment

October 21st, 2008

 

It took an op-ed on the Denver Post website by Lawrence J. Korb, assistant Secretary of Defense under Ronald Reagan, to raise some questions that reporters either haven’t asked or haven’t thought to ask Bob Schaffer about his business deals in Iraq in 2006. Korb’s analysis and the context he provides might just provoke local journos to start asking these questions:
 

Do you think there should be a national oil law in Iraq?  If you were charged with doing political research, as reported by the Rocky, for Aspect Energy, why didn’t you know about the oil law controversy until a Kurdish official told you about it on your trip? Did the State Department or any other agency give you any encouragement, as opposed to not just giving any discouragement? Did you know about your company’s correspondence with Sen. Allard? Have you or Alex Cranberg been in touch with the IG at the State Department, who is investigating the Hunt Oil contracts?
 

Or even a broad question:  Do you think it was a mistake to enter into an oil agreement before a compromise on the oil law was reached?  If not, why not, and why has the State Department been wrong?
 

And here’s a bonus question:  If you’re elected to the US Senate, would you join Sens. Levin and McCaskill in demanding an investigation and even hearings into Iraqi oil contracts?
 

Why hasn’t the local media been all over this story? No editorials? No front-page treatment? This is a serious issue, especially a guy running for federal office.
 

Here’s the Korb op-ed again.

Gunny Bob discovers I’m biased!

October 17th, 2008

Last night I was helping to spread the word about the arrival in Denver of the Hug Mobile, a van pulling a life-sized representation of the now famous photo of Bush and McCain hugging.

I thought KOA’s Gunny Bob might enjoy it. He’s the extreme right winger on KOA, 85 AM, from 7 to 10 p.m.

I’ve never forwarded a news release to him before, but there’s something about the HUG that I thought he’d appreciate.

Gunny hasn’t always wanted to talk to me in the past, but he got right back to me this time.

First, here’s an excerpt of the news release I forwarded to Gunny.

McCain = Bush Hug Mobile Spotlights Denver Premiere of “W” Movie 

A Mobile, Life-Sized Statue of Bush Embracing McCain 

Vehicle Will Be Parked at 16th and Welton Oct. 17 at 12:30, Just Prior to the First Denver Showing of “W” 

Hug Mobile to Go on State-Wide Tour 

What: The “Bush = McCain” tour consists of a van pulling a flatbed trailer carrying a statue of McCain and Bush embracing. The hug statue replicates a real photo-widely seen this election season-of McCain and Bush, with arms wrapped around each other and with McCain’s head buried into the chest of the taller Bush. The Bush = McCain vehicle will travel across Colorado. Click here for more information. 

And Gunny’s response to receiving the news release:

GUNNY: You have taken to spamming members of the media? Are you serious? Does your employer know about this?

JASON: I thought you might be interested.GUNNY: How can the unbiased media critic for a major daily–any paper, for that matter–be working for a clearly biased political action group? We’ll be covering this on the show tonight. Care to comment?

I’ve been freelancing for the Rocky for years, and Gunny, who’s attacked me repeatedly in the past, hasn’t figured out that I’m biased! I’m a lefty media critic. He hasn’t noticed? I try to be fair, and I guess I’m doing my job pretty well.

But can Gunny read my frequent “disclosures” in my column, like “Disclosure: A client favors legalization of Marijuana” or “A client works for Democrats.”

On the other hand, if Gunny thinks I’m not biased, it might explain why he thinks the news media is so liberal. He appears to make no distinction between the commentary section of the newspaper and the news section. Maybe he reads the Saturday column by Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman in the Rocky and thinks it’s proof of liberal bias at the Rocky. I’ll ask him tonight, as you can see below.

JASON: Sure. I’m not unbiased. If you look at my tagline, you’ll see that I run a PR company. I’m constantly disclosing this in my column.I’m not a Rocky staffer. I’m a freelancer. Do you want me on your show to discuss.

GUNNY:  Thank you, yes. I shall have Dom contact you for a call-in time. I am on 7-10 this evening. JASON: Keep in mind that Dave Kopel, my counterpart, works for the unbiased Independence Institute.Maybe we can discuss whether a hug is an appropriate metaphor for the relationship between Bush and McCain?

For background on Gunny, see Colorado Media Matters here. Don’t forget CMM for background on other Denver journalists.

Readers misled by headlines using passive voice

October 1st, 2008
The Rocky website just posted an AP article about this faux outrage from the Republicans over Gwen Ifill.
Here’s the headline: “Questions raised about VP debate moderator Ifill’s impartiality” 
File this sentence in drawer with other cliches of Washington-speak such as Bush’s statement that ‘mistakes were made’ in Iraq.
As we know, Bush was the one who made his own mistakes in Iraq.  Similarly, the questions about Ifill weren’t raised in a vacuum.  It was Republicans raising them.  Newspapers should say so.
It’s a bad habit of the press that they crouch in the passive voice, probably as a token show of ‘objectivity,’ or possibly as a way of chickening out.  In the latter case, editors may be afraid of assigning responsibility to somebody in the story, perhaps out of concern that they’ll offend some politically charged hack.
Plus, we know that headline space shouldn’t have been a problem.
For example:
Original Headline
“Questions raised about VP debate moderator Ifill’s impartiality” 
Words: 8 
Characters with spaces:  63 
  
Possible Alternatives
“GOP Raises Questions about VP debate moderator’s impartiality” 
Words: 8 
Characters with spaces: 61 
  
“GOP Raises Questions about VP debate moderator Ifill” 
Words: 8 
Characters with spaces: 52

A win for Rush, a loss for journalism

September 29th, 2008

In my Saturday column, I wrote that Kris Olinger, Director of AM Programming at Clear Channel here in Denver, decided not to add a left-leaning commentator during KOA’s morning newscast to balance Rush Limbaugh’s daily commentary.

This was disappointing because, in a previous email exchange, which I discussed in a previous column, Olinger seemed open to making her show more balanced journalistically. See my latest exchange with Olinger below.

From: Jason Salzman
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 10:45 AM
To: ‘Olinger, Kristine’
Subject: Rush Commentary
 
Hi Kris …•
 
Last Saturday, I wrote a column (Read it here, if you want.) about the one-minute commentary by Rush Limbaugh on Colorado’s Morning News.
 
I suggested you add a commentary by Jim Hightower every other day to balance Rush’s conservative views. (Listen to Hightower here.) This would be in keeping with the journalistic values of KOA’s news department. I’m not suggesting you balance your talk lineup on KOA, just the commentary during your news program. Some readers thought I was suggesting that you need to add Hightower to your talk lineup.
 
Readers of my column suggested that talkers from AM 760 be given a one minute spot, but I assume this isn’t practical, since they don’t have one-minute commentaries ready to go. I could look into this, if you think you’d possibly use any of them.
 
So I’m writing to ask if you’re willing to broadcast Hightower?
 
Again, I respect very much your willingness to consider him and other options to balance Rush.
 
Jason


From: Olinger, Kristine
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 3:56 PM
To: jason salzman
Subject: RE: Rush Commentary
 
Jason,
 
I’m sorry it’s taken awhile to get back to you.  We’ve been busy with conventions etc.  I’m familiar with Jim Hightower.  I don’t think he’s the right fit for the Denver market.  He certainly doesn’t have the following or name recognition of Rush or Paul Harvey and he would be an expensive addition.
Beyond that, I’m curious why you’re not demanding that we air a conservative viewpoint on AM760 Colorado’s Progressive Station or that NPR add more conservative content? 
Kris Olinger
  From: Jason Salzman
Sent: Sun 9/7/2008 4:00 PM
To: Olinger, Kristine
Subject: RE: Rush Commentary


Hi …•
 
My point is that Colorado’s Morning News is a newscast that reflects journalistic values of fairness, except there’s a daily conservative commentary in the middle of it that’s not balanced by a liberal commentary.  I’m not saying you need a liberal talker on KOA for three hours to balance Rush. I just think that, in keeping with the journalism that you present on Colorado’s Morning News, you should offer a commentator from the left as well as the right.
 
There’s no newscast on AM760. There’s no news show like CO Morning News.
 
Please see my column for a longer explanation here.
 
JASON
 
From: Olinger, Kristine
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 9:20 PM
To: jason@effectcommunications.com
Subject: RE: Rush Commentary
 Hey Jason,
 
First things first.  AM760 does carry newscasts.  From 6a – 10a we carry a CBS cast followed by a local cast Monday – Friday.  We carry a CBS cast every hour the rest of the day.  We carry a significant amount of CBS long-form coverage on national events.  Do you listen to the station?  Have you ever listened to AM760? 
 
You neglected to respond to my question about NPR…specifically in morning drive.  I’d like a response.
Finally, in answer to your concerns about Colorado’s Morning News, I read your column the day it was printed.  My issue with you has always been your lack of knowledge and accuracy about radio, not your viewpoint. 
See AM760 correction above and your lack of response to the NPR question.
You seem to have some admiration for the 850KOA News Department but still can’t help yourself from taking shots.  Colorado’s Morning News is not an ALL NEWS radio product such as WCBS or KCBS.  It is more like a newspaper (horrors) or a TV morning show that covers a lot of ground.  It has been for as long as I can remember.  Yes, KOA leans right and male.  That’s the audience we serve.  We cover a lot of sports (horrors) because that’s what our audience wants.  What audience does the Rocky serve?  What audience does the Denver Post serve?  Do the newspapers include “fluff” as you call it?  That would include features on anything from rock concerts to gardening to home improvement to movies to silly feature stories about Paris Hilton to features about Health or Kids?  Does that content take away from the hard work both newspaper’s reporters do each day?  Come on.  Can our anchors do better.  Of course, we can all do better. Should they robatically deliver only the “news”  every morning for four hours?  I don’t think so.


Finally, Rush is as entertaining as he is political.  Like it or not, he has a huge following and we will continue to carry his commentary and show as we will continue to carry Mike Rosen’s “tease” during CMN and his show.


I still want an answer on NPR and I would like you to include AM760 and KHOW in this debate.  Clear Channel Denver is offering listenings great options with KOA, KHOW and AM760.  Aren’t we?


Love the debate (horrors).  I think it’s healthy.


Kris Olinger


From: Jason Salzman
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2008 9:58 PM
To: ‘Olinger, Kristine’
Subject: RE: Rush Commentary


Hey, I like a debate, too. And I respect you for answering my questions. Thanks.
  Yes, I listen to AM760. It’s got a puny newscast, nothing like Colorado’s Morning News. It’s not comparable. No reporters. The CBS cast is completely different. I’m glad you’ve got CBS and the headlines during Marvin, but if you’re looking for breaking news and serious news reports and fair-minded interviews in the morning in Denver on the radio, your choice is really KOA or KCFR…-though KCFR is much more about the national news from NPR and much less from Denver.
 

Still, your question about KCFR’s local newscast is more relevant, but please point out how it’s biased. I don’t hear a conservative or liberal commentator on the show every day with no counterpoint. Colorado Matters, the local interview show on KCFR, is journalistically sound, but it occurs outside the newscast anyway.
 I like CMN. I’d personally like less sports and fluff, and I like less in the newspaper, too. But I still like CMN partly because there’s at least an effort to be fair and accurate. (I try to be fair and accurate, too; please point out all errors you spot in my column. I’d really appreciate this.)
 

You’ve got two conservative commentators “teasing” during CMN. Their “teases,” especially Rush’s, amount to a political message embedded in your newscast, which otherwise strives to be fair. This degrades your show. Why not add a liberal commentator, as you initially said you might do, if you found the right one. Why isn’t Hightower right?
 Yes, I know KOA leans right. That’s ok. But your newscast, which acts like it’s a journalistic enterprise, shouldn’t lean right. Do you disagree?
 

Does CMN lean right?
 Jason
 

Olinger never replied to my last email above, and she was too busy to talk to me on the phone the day before my column deadline last week.

I give her credit for engaging with me, but I still don’t understand why she won’t air Hightower…-if she wants Colorado’s Morning News to look more like a serious journalistic effort. I mean, why not, given that she understands the need for balance on her show?

Beyond Meet the Press

September 24th, 2008

In my last post, I showed how the Rocky failed to provide readers with facts essential to understanding a quote from Dick Wadhams regarding an upcoming debate on Meet the Press.

Colorado Media Matters pointed out Monday that the Rocky has developed a bit of a pattern of letting Wadhams make false allegations, without questioning him adequately or setting the record straight.

Here’s the summary of the CMM item:

Reporting on August presidential campaign donations, the Rocky Mountain News continued its practice of quoting critical or inflammatory remarks about Democrats from Colorado Republican Party chair Dick Wadhams while providing no response from Democrats. The News quoted Wadhams as referencing Gov. Sarah Palin in stating that Democrats are “repulsed by the notion that an articulate, competent, successful woman could be running on the Republican ticket.”

Meet the Press

September 22nd, 2008

Colorado Senate candidate Bob Schaffer’s spokesperson, Dick Wadhams, seems to be manipulating the media in some strange way every time he’s in the news these days.

This time he’s telling Lynn Bartels at the Rocky Mountain News that the Producers at Meet the Press had mostly given up on trying to convince Schaffer’s opponent, Mark Udall, to accept their invitation to debate. Bartels quoted Wadhams:

“I can tell you that Meet the Press had pretty well given up on him,” Wadhams said. “The producers didn’t think he was going to do it. “We pretty much shamed them into accepting the debate.”

But Bartels didn’t state whether Wadhams accusation was true. Just because an allegation sits within quotation marks doesn’t mean reporters shouldn’t fact check it–or at least get a response to it.I called up Meet the Press, and the show’s publicist, Jenny Tartikoff, would only tell me, “We don’t comment on our booking process.”

You wouldn’t expect the truth-crusaders at Meet the Press to illuminate the truth for citizens in an importatn Senate race, would you? Oh well, I can see the logic of not commenting on the booking process in some cases, but here’s a situation where Meet the Press is being used by Wadhams. Meet the Press should have set the record straight.

For her part, Bartels wrote me that she had contacted Mee the Press, and she had intended to put its response into her article, but this was dropped from the final version of her article. She wrote me by email:

We initially had in there a line that we didn’t get a response from Meet the Press, and a line about how Tara Trujillo laughed out aloud when I told her what Wadhams said about Meet the Press.Those were removed. Can’t remember if it was space or some other reason.That was more than 24 hours ago!

…Some background: Wayne Allard was the first sitting senator to debate on MTP. Before, incumbents figured why risk it.

The debate can be important. Pete Coors in 2004 mistakenly said North Dakota was part of the axis of evil. Republicans kind of gave up. That same year, John Thune and Tom Dashle debated. Thune didn’t win but didn’t lose, either. He showed he could hold his own with Thune.

I think the most fascinating thing is the sidebar to my story. It was Schaffer who told Benson in 1994 to quit debating, a move that pundits said helped sink his campaign.

In the end, Wadhams used the credibility of Meet the Press to advance his agenda. Neither the Rocky nor Meet the Press should have allowed him to do this.

The Meet the Press debate takes place Sept. 28.

 

 

 

David Brooks loves Woody Allen?

September 5th, 2008

My friend David Grinspoon noticed that New York Times columnist David Brooks, in a column last week, appears to have re-written a joke from Woody Allen.

Brooks: “One path before us leads to the past, and the extinction of the human race. The other path leads to the future, when we will all be dead. We must choose wisely.”

Woody: “More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness.  The other, to total extinction.  Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.”

I like Woody’s version better.

You can’t quite call this plagiarism, but you couldn’t really say that Allen merely inspired Brooks either. The quotes are too close to being identical.

I asked Brooks and the Times’ ombudsman, Clark Hoyt, about it, but they didn’t respond to my emails. I’ll call Brooks next week.